引用本文:冒志磊,万 婷,张丽娜,张克良*.[cn_title][J].[journal_cn_name],2019,[volume]([issue]):1546-1548.[点击复制]
Mao Zhilei,Wan Ting,Zhang Lina,Zhang Keliang*.[en_title][J].[journal_en_name],2019,[volume]([issue]):1546-1548.[点击复制]
【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 2264次   下载 1 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
高校附属医院伦理审查风险点排查及改进措施探讨△
冒志磊,万 婷,张丽娜,张克良*
0
(南京医科大学附属常州妇幼保健院科教科)
摘要:
目的:寻找医院科研伦理审查中存在的不足并提出改进措施,完善伦理审查过程。方法:对我院现有伦理委员会工作记录和科研项目伦理审查流程进行梳理,排查伦理审查中暴露的高风险点,通过征询有关专家意见形成改进措施。结果:我院科研项目审查存在6个风险点,专家建议采取6项措施加以改进。结论:伦理委员会是保障科研项目在伦理允许的范围内进行开展的重要防线,只有不断完善伦理委员会对科研项目的伦理审查过程,防止项目在未得到伦理许可的条件下开展,才能防止“伦理危机”的发生。
关键词:  医院  科研项目  伦理审查  风险排查  措施改进
DOI:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81703256)
Investigation of the Risk and Improvement Strategies in Ethical Review of Research Projects in the Hospitals Affiliated to University△
Mao Zhilei,Wan Ting,Zhang Lina,Zhang Keliang*
(Department of Technology and Education,Changzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University)
Abstract:
Objective::To find the shortcomings in the ethical review of hospital scientific research and to propose improvement measures to improve the ethical review process. Methods:The risk points in the ethical review were investigated by checking the ethics committee’s work records and the ethical review process of scientific research projects,then the improvement measures were proposed by consulting relevant experts. Results:There were six risk points in the ethical review of scientific research projects in our hospital,and the experts recommended corresponding countermeasures to improve them. Conclusions:The ethics committee is an important defense line that ensures the scientific research projects to be carried out within the ethical permission. Only the continuous improvement of ethics review process can prevent the incidence of ”ethical crisis”.
Key words:  hospital  research projects  ethical review  risk searching  strategy improvement

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫