引用本文:贾增丽.[cn_title][J].[journal_cn_name],2020,[volume]([issue]):597-599.[点击复制]
JIA Zengli.[en_title][J].[journal_en_name],2020,[volume]([issue]):597-599.[点击复制]
【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1962次   下载 4 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
ICD-10与ICD-11的异同分析
贾增丽
0
(南京鼓楼医院信息科)
摘要:
目的:了解ICD-10及ICD-11,分析两者使用及发展情况,探寻从ICD-10到ICD-11过渡使用的方法。方法:利用现有的资源,对ICD-10及ICD-11的概念、结构及编码规则进行阐述,并通过具体疾病在ICD-10及ICD-11中的分类情况,对比分析两者存在的异同。结果:概念上,两者同属于WHO的主要出版物,是国际疾病分类方法的不同修订版本;结构上,ICD-11对ICD-10有所延续、删除,最大变化是框架做了调整,极大扩展了编码和应用范围;编码规则上,ICD-11在ICD-10的基础上,编码的表现形式呈现了很大不同。结论:随着医学的发展及管理需求的变化,ICD-10由于其结构等的局限性已经不能满足分类的需求,研究使用ICD-11是疾病分类面临的重要课题。
关键词:  ICD-10  ICD-11
DOI:
基金项目:
Based on ICD-10,better understand the changes of ICD-11
JIA Zengli
(Information Department,Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital)
Abstract:
Objective:To understand ICD-10 and ICD-11,analyze their usage and development,and explore the method of transition from ICD-10 to ICD-11. Methods:The concepts,structures and coding rules of ICD-10 and ICD-11 were explained by using resources available,the differences and similarities between them were analyzed by the classification of specific diseases in ICD-10 and ICD-11. Result:Conceptually,both of them are the main publications of the WHO,which are different versions of the international classification of diseases. Structurally,ICD-11 extends and deletes from ICD-10.The most significant change being the adjustment of the framework,in coding rules,ICD-11,on the basis of ICD-10,the coding forms are very different. Conclusion:Accompany with the development of medicine and the change of management demand,ICD-10 can not satisfy the needs of classification because of it’s structure and so on.
Key words:  ICD-10  ICD-11

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫